4 Comments

Just like you I also read Sapiens after the hype-wave but before the backlash and got really frustrated with the intellectual hipsterism of all the people pretending to be so far above it. I think you hit the nail on the head here. "Dorm-room tier epiphanies" aren't a bad thing, and broad appeal public intellectuals are important. Sometimes I worry that the primacy of sneering, dunking, and debunking on social media is a way more destructive information environment than the idealistic TED-talks I grew up on. Like you get the impression that everything is bullshit all the time, except hopelessly niche books that you'd never find the energy to read (and if you did you'd lack the prior knowledge needed to understand it). I wouldn't be surprised if that atmosphere would make some people retreat from intellectual curiosity completely.

Expand full comment

This is well put. I am a partisan for unadulterated intellectual curiosity, epistemic humility, and tolerance for solemn heterodoxy. Intellectual naivete and cynicism/snobbery are equally unappealing to me.

Expand full comment

Makes me want to read some Harari!

Expand full comment

Thanks! I just read the "graphic novel" version of Sapiens. Perhaps that is the way to read public intellectuals. You get the gist of the story without taking it too seriously.

Expand full comment
Error